My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Transit- Meeting Agenda (12/18/1997)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Transit- Meeting Agenda (12/18/1997)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:49:34 AM
Creation date
8/18/2011 2:50:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10291
Title
Transit- Meeting Agenda (12/18/1997)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ Chair Franke said the two sources of funding for <br />the County's share of the project came from the <br />value of the Senator Block praperty that the <br />County owned and to utiiize th~ resources that <br />the County departments currently pay for rent <br />and lease. He says the citizens did not want to <br />spend more property tax dollars far a downtown <br />service center even if it provided increased <br />efficiency. <br />The need to provide additional state court space <br />and the desire to consolidate county offices are <br />the two reasons the county entered into this <br />p-oject. <br />Regarding accusations of conflict of interest, <br />Chair Franke stated tha~t Dan Berrey resigned <br />from the Transit 6oard before the Courthouse <br />Square Project went out for an RFP, responded <br />to the RFP and competed for the p~oject against <br />one other proposer at the time. A panel, <br />selected by the County and Transit that included <br />county, city, state and private sector, reviewed <br />the proposals. The Transit District had only one <br />member on the panel. He stated there is no <br />evidence that Mr. 6errey had inside infiormation <br />on this project. County legal counsel does not <br />believe the~e is anything unusual in the sequence <br />of events. <br />Luis Caraballo said one of the reasons the SABA <br />Corp, was not chosen is they were not wiliing to <br />relinquish ownership of the facility upon <br />completion of payment of the debt. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, 12/4197, PAGE 7 <br />57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.