My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Financial- COPS (Official Statement/Drafts)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Financial- COPS (Official Statement/Drafts)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 2:27:01 PM
Creation date
8/23/2011 11:17:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10161
Title
Financial- COPS (Official Statement/Drafts)
Company
Marion County
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Finance
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
investments are made. As to the cost of having the Trustee make the <br />investments as compared to the cost of having the County do so, I would ask <br />S <br />»> MICHAEL HANSEN <MHANSEN@OPENGOVT.OPEN.ORG> 11/30 3:38 PM »> <br />** High Priority ** <br />Ed, <br />I've completed a review of the documents you sent via UPS on November <br />24th. I have some comments/questions, which I will try to correspond <br />with a document, paragraph and page number: <br />FINANCE AND TRUST AGREEMENT <br />Page 1, Fourth "Whereas", Could this be changed to read "will enter" <br />after "District" and before "in to"? The County and Transit won't execute <br />the Condominium Declaration until we have a condominium to declare. I <br />understood this to mean we would wait until the project is complete. <br />Page 8, Section 202(D), Is there an extra "the hereby covenants and <br />agrees" in the seventh line? Perhaps this can be eliminated. It does not <br />seem necessary. Although the sentence is ten lines long, there is need <br />for only one covenant at the beginning of the sentence. I understand the <br />entire paragraph to provide that rental interruption insurance proceeds <br />go to make bond payments (as MBIA requires), and that the county will <br />have a line item in the proposed budget to pay any difference between <br />insurance proceeds and bond payment amounts. All of this is subject to <br />appropriation by the Board. <br />Page 17, Section 204(E), The language states: "...then the principal <br />components of the 1998 Certificates will be subject to mandatory <br />prepayment....". Does "subject to" give the county the option to redeem, <br />or is the county obligated to redeem if the determination not to proceed <br />with the project is made? <br />I think the county wants the option. It may be unlikely that the <br />county <br />could proceed, but I would hate to foreclose the possibility of proceeding <br />unilaterally. The July 1, 1999, date gives transit and the county time to <br />work out a joint solution. Failing that, shouldn't we preserve the option <br />to <br />go it alone? <br />Page 29, Section 306(D). I just want to be sure that the county must <br />purchase a$22,000,000 title policy. The $22,000,000 is equal to the COP <br />issuance. Until the project is actually built, the county only has the <br />land <br />to insure...as an existing asset. Title insurance for the value of the <br />land <br />would cover the real property mortgage. Title insurance for the value of <br />the county's interest in the project ($22,000,000) could be acquired <br />when the condo mortgage is substituted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.