Laserfiche WebLink
Craig recapped the direction we need to go, would be to get price on simply removing walls, <br />stop filling basements with rubble, go back to test soundness of slabs, make decision whether to <br />~ pull out slabs or leave in, and get credit for not filling in basement in senator per existing <br />contract. We need a base to make good assumptions and get an accurate price to compare with <br />Pence/Kelly prices. Dave and Leonard will check on basement floor depths. Dave also <br />suggested best unit price to use for comparison would be equipment and labor rather than time <br />and materials. When we get Staton unit prices, it would be appropriate to have Pence/Kelly <br />look at for comparison. <br />The following items will be presented to Staton for consideration: Unit price (equipment & <br />labor not to exceed) to leave slabs in place; what is the credit for not filling in the senator <br />basement with rubble, discontinue placing rubble in any basements, and identify depths of slabs <br />in existing basements. It was noted that we might have a way to measure basement depths in <br />the senator safely through access points in sidewalk if they are or could be uncovered. <br />Schedule <br />Dave reported that there are no changes to the schedule for this week and it was not reprinted. <br />Randy had one issue regarding completion date on the project and if we are still on target to <br />original schedule. He may have problem with having to e~rtend leases for county departments <br />beyond May, 1999, if the project is delayed for any reason. A lot depends on a.nswer we receive <br />from city regarding P 1 options and how we proceed. If we receive positive feedback from city, <br />this item needs to get on the council's agenda ASAP. R.G. expressed his concem that this item <br />get put on the schedule for first Monday in August and not wait to present with urban renewal <br />portion when R.G. retums from vacation. Also, if we receive positive response from city, it <br />will be okay for Leonard to continue work on the P 1 option. <br />Once Dave looks at county and transit TI's he can set target date to develop schedule. Dave will <br />be out of the office until Wednesday of next week and upon his retum will work with budgets <br />and could have information together a week from next Monday. Overall budget has some subs <br />not getting back to him unti128'~ anyway. <br />How much time does eliminating P2 save in the schedule? Dave's guess would be one-half <br />month or maybe more. With the P1 structure, you have excavation, framing, build up and then <br />start building on top of yoursel£ It could possibly be more. <br />Randy had a question rega.rding GMP. We have GMP and complete development <br />agreements finish date of August 15, given what's just happened, may we revisit this date? <br />What Dave is working on now will be pretty close. The electrical is little under designed for a <br />GMP. When do you want it? Randy and R.G. need to make some financing decisions by <br />September 1. Financing cannot proceed until we have a firm budget. We don't want to push <br />this area and end up making bad decisions. Certain requirements need to be met to hit the <br />September 1 deadline. Randy and R.G. will both be out of the office for part of August. Earlier <br />deadlines of DD documents ready on July 15~` have been delayed and that makes the GMP <br />deadline of August 15~' unrealistic since we don't have final information on the pa.rking structure <br />yet. Final GMP date reset at September 15te, and October lSt to finalize and negotiate for <br />financing. <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />