My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:47:33 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:03:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10302
Title
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
BLDG Date
8/19/1997
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6-10 A 100-gallon tank was discovered along Church St. during the excavation of perimeter wall <br />footings. Tests indicate that there is no contamination beneath the tank. <br />PERMITS AND APPROVALS <br />ARCHITECTURAL <br />Space Planning Revisions <br />4-29 Leonard has transmitted a proposal for design services for possible modifications of the space <br />plans. REV. 5-13 A meeting with those departments who have requested space planning <br />revisions has been scheduled for 5-17. REV. 5-27 Randy C. is working to assess the scope of <br />the design modifications and potential design and construction cost impacts. Once the scope <br />has been determined, and a design is developed, the changes will be priced by P/K in the form <br />of a Proposal Request. REV. 6-10 Leonard is preparing design proposals and estimated <br />construction costs (using ACC's estimates) of the County's space plan revisions. These <br />estimates will be presented the BOC for approval. ACTION: If the spacesaver system is <br />approved, Leonard will prepare a request for proposal for P!K to price. Bidding the <br />Spacesaver system would cause delays in the design and construction schedule. Transit has <br />minor changes they would like to make to their space plans. <br />Time CapsuleBrick Sale <br />5-27 The brick sale concept has been abandoned. The time capsule will be located at the building <br />entrance. P/K is preparing a COR. REV. 6-10 Transit is still exploring the possibility of a <br />brick sale with proceeds being used for art. A Transit board decision is pending. <br />LEED/Recycling of Construction Waste <br />5-27 Harding Lawson has reviewed the specifications and prepared a comparison with LEED <br />program requirements. According to this preliminary comparison, the project is several <br />points short of qualifying for certification. REV. 6-10 A meeting has been scheduled for June <br />17 at 10:30 to discuss the LEED program. Attendees will include Solid Waste, HLA and <br />members of the design team. The agenda will include an updated LEED status report and <br />potential costs associated with obtaining the LEED designation. <br />CONTRACTOR I5SUES <br />Value Engineering Cost Sharing <br />5-13 Billy, John and Craig met and recommended a 60% (owner)/40%(contractor) split of net <br />savings. This recommendation includes other conditions that preserve the owner's decision- <br />making authority. The BOC and the Transit Boards are considering P/K's request for shared <br />savings on contractor-proposed VE items. P/K has made their first VE proposal. They have <br />recommended that the owners reduce the low e coating on the skylights due to the frit glass <br />finish already applied to skylights. REV. 5-27 The BOC have approved the VE savings split. <br />Approval from Transit is still pending. P/K submitted VE proposal #2. This proposal <br />recommended that the owners replace the 1600 amp busduct feeding the roof top equipment <br />switchboard with conduit and wire. The unallocated savings are $2,907 and, according to P/K <br />could prevent future additional costs. REV. 6-10 John is working with Ben F. to determine <br />the best mechanism to include this provision in the construction contract. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.