My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:47:33 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:03:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10302
Title
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
BLDG Date
8/19/1997
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Demolition: The site survey is completed. The demolition plan is completed and I~ ill be finalized <br />tomorrow (3/7). Dan will get this to Dave. Len reported that Steve is concerned abo~i.rt the vacation <br />permit for the alley. EYCavation can be handled separately. The vacation of the a~ley should not <br />interfere with what the contractors need to do. !, <br />, <br />Civil: Dan is not concerned about the civil permit at this time. The technical !,specs are done. <br />The civil plan review is scheduled for 5/19. I <br />Design: Dan showed Randy the new design of the fifth floor, with the atrium cpming through. <br />There was general discussion around the design. Dave is going to work further on thje atrium design <br />and cost. Len reported that the cost of the glass covering over the pedestrian walkvl~ays is at about <br />$25.00 sf, which is better than originally expected. ! <br />The tower and northwest corner are changing to be less of a tower and more of a squl~are corner with <br />a sloping roof to match the plaza. The corner still mimics the plaza side. Dan will d~uble check the <br />common areas before Len finalizes the design. ' <br />Mechanical: Len reported that he has been contacted by people at the Dept. of En~rgy who would <br />like to commission the mechanical system. He has had experience with this in ntario. Going <br />through the commissioning process generally addresses problems immediately ar~d we will more <br />likely have a more functioning building. The state will provide a 35% tax credit tolcover a portion <br />of the cost. Randy has already put some language in the development agreement. H~ wouldn't mind <br />paying to avoid the problems that come with the mechanicals. j <br />Dan needs to have some meetings with Mark to explore some of the tax credit optiqns. Len highly <br />recommends commissioning the mechanical. ', <br />ACTION: Dan and Len will set up a meeting with the state. Len has asked t em for a list of <br />people who deal with this. It should not be the company that installs the mechani al. <br />Day care: Dan is hoping to have the day care issue resolved in about two we~ks. <br />Traffic Flow: RG asked Len about the flow of traffic out of the parking garage. ~'raffic will have <br />to cross and there is also a sight distance issue. ' <br />ACTION: Len will look at the design. <br />Ground Breaking: Randy asked for discussion on the ground breaking issue. V~e are nearing the <br />point where we need to decide if we want a ground breaking ceremony. Traditi nally the county <br />does this. It can be done two ways, either when the building comes down, or aft r demolition by <br />turning over a shovel full of soil. This takes planning. Dan supports the idea of a ground breaking <br />ceremony. The project needs the PR. Ideally, if we could take one part of the ilding to knock <br />wn because the demolition is not going to bring the building down in one explos~oin. RG said that <br />do , , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.