Laserfiche WebLink
Mark and Billy Wasson respectively. <br />~ Agenda item #7, Analysis of $1.30, will be presented by Billy Wasson. Randy Curtis will be <br />available to assist in fielding any questions generated by this report. Transit has a companion <br />report which will be presented by 7ohn Whittington. <br />Agenda item #8, Analysis of $1.60, has a cover memo and attachments along with a letter from Don <br />Palmer reconfirming his opinion that $1.60 rental rate is reasonable for leased space. A copy of <br />a sensitivity report prepared by Craig Lewis of Melvin Mark was attached. Billy Wasson will go <br />over this report, and Melvin Mark representatives will available to answer any questions. <br />Agenda item #9, Courthouse & Franklin Building costs will be presented by Ra.ndy Curtis. This <br />information had been previously submitted and will be addressed once again. <br />Agenda item #10, Pazking Issues, Transit has a memo that presents transit's commitment to do a bid <br />alternate on full parking spaces, adding back in the 60 or 66 spaces. They requested Craig Lewis <br />to do an analysis and his costs came in at over $1 million, including soft costs. Pence/Kelly's <br />earlier numbers indicate a cost of just under $500,000. Transit needs to know what actual costs <br />would be for additional parking spaces. R.G. Andersen-Wyckoff said at $500,000, it would be a <br />pass-through with a monthly rental rate of $55 over a 25 year period. Transit is not advocating more <br />parking, but it would be an option to review. <br />Clarification was made as to what parking issues SPOC would be targeting and would it include <br />~ concerns raised by the Chamber regarding parking. John Whittington said the memo states that <br />the 258 underground spaces meets all county/transit needs, plus the 44 spaces returned on the street <br />is not an unreasonable solution to the problem. Ra.ndy Curtis said there is still the option of <br />changing the way parking is structured and gaining another 15% more in parking spaces. Mazcia <br />Kelly had noted that this was an issue she wanted to be sure that the boards were prepared to address <br />if any questions are surfaced by SPOC. She also stated that there is consistency over a three year <br />period with the parking spaces still at the same number as city/county/transit discussed in 1995. <br />Agenda item #11, Efficiencies, has a response from the Board of Commissioners. Randy Franke <br />will cover this item. Transit did a separate mailing regazding specific conflict of interest issues <br />from the transit board. Transit will also draft a letter from their boazd and get it out to the <br />committee as soon as possible addressing their response to 14£ They will also include an in-house <br />document showing a comparison of administrative staffing percentages and relationships with their <br />response. <br />Agenda item #12, Accountability, Board Issues, Billy Wasson will do a brief summary of cunent <br />county restructuring and also include a copy of employee ethics policy. <br />A question was asked about the format for Wednesday evening's meeting. SPOC will be <br />encowaged to get the consultants done on Tuesday evening. It was unknown whether staff would <br />be asked to leave any time during this meeting. Mark Wieprecht has already put a message to the <br />~ <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />