My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Special Project Oversight Committee (SPOC) Report #1
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Special Project Oversight Committee (SPOC) Report #1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:44:14 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 12:12:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10317
Title
Special Project Oversight Committee (SPOC) Report #1
Company
Marion County
BLDG Date
11/14/1997
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SummaryBackground Reports <br />Courthouse Square <br />Purpose: Part one of this report contains a brief history of the project with specific <br />emphasis on Marion County's interests and needs. Part two, is summary of the transit <br />portion of the project. <br />Background: In 1995 the county owned appro~umately 85% of the Senator Block. The <br />county had been acquiring ownership of the block since 1974 when we purchased the old <br />Senator Hotel. The aging condition of the Senator office building and the need to move <br />county departments out of the Courthouse necessitated the county to prepare a master <br />facility plan in 1993. The plan concluded that the county should mai.ntain its pri.mary <br />government office buildings in downtown Salem. On three occasions since the late <br />1970's, the city, county and transit district recognized the Senator block as the preferred <br />site for a transit center and also encouraged joint development as the best use of the site. <br />In 1996, the availability of $7 million in federal funds and up to $2 million in urban <br />renewal funds made the project a reality. <br />Original Proposal: In February of 1996, proposals were requested to solicit a developer <br />for Courthouse Square. The request for proposals (RFP) stated the county needed <br />50,000 sf of office space in the first year (1999) with an additional 60,000 sf needed for <br />growth over a 20 year period. Developers were asked to include a design for 250 parki.ng <br />spaces in the proposal. Dan Berrey of Prudential Real Estate Professionals and his <br />development team consisting of Arbuckle Costic Architects and Pence/Kelly <br />Construction was chosen to complete the project. <br />(Note): Based on an analysis of available class A/B office space in the downtown area, <br />the county concluded that if it had to purchase an e~usting office building or lease space <br />for departments being displaced from the Courthouse, the lease rate would be at least <br />$1.20/sf. This rate was chosen as a goal for rates paid by county departments in <br />Courthouse Square. <br />Design Evolution and Cost: The first proposal by Mr. Berrey was for a 186,000 gsf <br />office building costing an estimated $34 million. An above-ground parking garage <br />containing 642 parking stalls was included. Lease rates for the county, depending on <br />different options, ranged from $0.89 to $1,42/ sf. In the originai proposal, the county <br />would not obtain an ownership position unless a residual payment estimated at $38 <br />million was paid. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.