My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Special Project Oversight Committee (SPOC) Report #1
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Special Project Oversight Committee (SPOC) Report #1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:44:14 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 12:12:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10317
Title
Special Project Oversight Committee (SPOC) Report #1
Company
Marion County
BLDG Date
11/14/1997
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Summary Report ~ „,. ., „ <br />Courthouse Square Transit Facility ~~ ~ ~ <br />Purpose: The follo~ving is a summaxy of the Transit portion of the <br />Courihouse Square project. <br />Background: For the past two decades, even before the Transit District <br />e:dsted, there ~ as discussion of the need for a downtown transit faality, with <br />emphasis on t~e centralized Senator block. In fact, in the past, a bus terminal <br />had been adjacent to the Senator Hotel and supported by a cafe in the hotel. In <br />1985, ~he first plans for the use of the Senator block for transit faciiities were <br />drawn a.nd proposed by a consultant team including former city manager Bob <br />lYloore. At about that time, the city authorized the use of the High Street <br />location, in front of the Courthouse, as a temporary transit facility, while the <br />District firmed up its plans and financing for a permanent site. In August <br />1995, after considering many sites, a citizen site selection committee settled on <br />four primary sites, including the Senator block. The committee did not <br />recommend the site, however, because of their belief that the politics involved <br />(the site was County owned) would be insurmountable. The technical advisory <br />committee (composed of transit, city, county, and COG sta.~ recommended the <br />site as their top priority because of its superior functionality. Subsequently, <br />city sta.ff recommended to the City Council thai the Senator block be supported <br />because of serious technical drawbacks on the other primary sites. In <br />November 199~, Transit and Marion County determined that a public <br />partnership was in both parties best interest and the best interest of 11~Iarion <br />County/Transii taxpayers. And Courthouse Square was born. <br />Site Benefits: The primary benefits of the site were, and are: <br />• Site is publicly owned and does not require condemnation. <br />• Site provides ingress a.nd egress at mid-block, as dictated by the city, <br />and utilizes two major one-way streets to move buses to and from the <br />site without major tra.~c interruption. ~ <br />• Site is centrally located to the downtown and particularly to the <br />largest employee/commuter base - the Capitol Mall, other <br />government o~ces, Salem Centre, and the business core. <br />• Site provided for ma~;m7Trg site potential with a willing partner. <br />Facilities: Not only has there been a long-term need to remove the <br />temporary bus facility from its current High Street location, as directed by the <br />City Council in I993, but there has been substa.ntial public discussion, as well, <br />over the need to make the District's administrative and policy functions more <br />accessible to the public. In addition, the growth of tra.nsit services and the <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.