My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Demolition Documents (compiled notebook)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Demolition Documents (compiled notebook)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:11:05 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 1:43:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10319
Title
Demolition Documents (compiled notebook)
BLDG Date
8/28/1998
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Design - Planning
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. That the City receive detailed financial information about the project, including the particulars of the <br />arrangement between the private parties and public enrities. <br />Marion County/Salem Area Transit Joint Development presented items 1 and 3, listed above, for the review ~ <br />and recommendation of the Downtown Development Advisory Board. Item 2, listed above, requires no <br />further action. Measure 50 has been implemented and the urban renewal programs successfully funded. • <br />FACTS AND FINDINGS: <br />Cost Estimate. The elements proposed by Marion County/Salem Area Transit for urban renewal funding are <br />estimated to total $1,996,049, as listed in Attachment A. Architectural renderings depicting the proposed <br />elements are shown in Attachments B and C. The cost estimates have been developed by a professional <br />estimator and are presented to illustrate the magnitude of each element of requested participation. Actual <br />participation should be limited to the cost of construction derived from a public bid process and paid as a <br />reimbursement to Marion County/Salem Area Transit as construction progress payments are made to the <br />contractor. ~ <br />Elements of ParticiQation. The request for participation is generally categorized into three segments - <br />Streetscape Elements, Supplemental Streetscape and Reimbursements. Detail of each element and a project <br />overview is contained in Attachments D and E. <br />Streetscape Elements <br />The majority of projected participation costs are the elements associated with streetscape improvements. <br />The specifications for hard surface improvements and the architectural design have been reviewed by staff <br />and found consistent with existing streetscape improvements. The specification for pavers has been <br />modified to a full-depth paver to eliminate buckling and cracking to reduce future maintenance costs. <br />The largest component of the streetscape is the element described as an Arcade/Pavilion fronting High and <br />Church Streets. This element, depicted in the attached diagram, is located on the development parcel <br />adjacent to but outside of the public right-of-way. The proposed improvements consist of a series of <br />structures linked with overhead "weather protection". Located at the bus entrances on High and Church <br />Streets are two engineered truss structures designed to support weather protection, each spanning an <br />approximate 75 foot distance. The resulting arcade effect is consistent with the concepts of the core area <br />design standards. <br />There is a policy issue concerning participation in the arcade/weather protection located on the development <br />parcel. To date, the renewal program has limited its participation in weather protection systems to a <br />maximum of $160 per lineal foot of awning/marquees attached to a building front extending over the <br />sidewalk/right-of-way. The awning system attached to the arcade structure and building facade on Court <br />Street are consistent with the existing program and are estimated to be approximately within the <br />participation cost. <br />Although consistent with the objectives of the urban renewal plan, the Agency has not previously funded <br />systems outside the right-of-way located on a development parcel. Due to the unique nature of the proposed <br />public development of the block and the design constraints imposed by the bus access, staff supports funding <br />the arcade element fronting Church and High Streets. Furthermore, the location of the arcade outside of the <br />right-of-way will provide a larger weather protected area without subjecting the City to a maintenance <br />liability. <br />~ <br />Courthouse Square Streetscape Funding 2 For Meeting of October 12, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.