BOC Files (Folders 1-3) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

02/16/99 16:37 $503 588 5495 HUMAN RESOURCES ~~~ BOC 1~002%005 SAMTp 8oa~d of Directors February 17,1988 Page 2 Altemate 7, relites in County conference rooms Altemate 9, altematnre frnishes in CoUn#y solid waste offices Altemate 10, grease duct and make-up air u~it in transi# lease spaces Altemate 1'f, dodc tower pavilion and weather protection aroades ~~- Altemate '45, Ceramic fit (sunscreen) on transit shetter glazing 7. The total cosf af the base bids and recommended altemates are shown an attachment B. As r~ecommended by staff, Oistrict parkicipation in the cost of these altemates woufd be as follows: Altemate 1, parking expansian #0 258 spaces-Transit does not partiapate in the c:onstruction cost, but purchases 40 spaces from the county at a prorated cost Aftemate 2, parking expansion to 31~4 spaces-Transit shares i~ the construction cost of the parlcing for the transit-oriented development site using the approved cost sh~ring formu(a Altemate 7, relites in County conference rooms--Transit does not sharE in this cost Altemate 9, altemative finishes in Counfy solid waste otfices-Transit does not share in this cast Aftemate 10, gt~ase duct and make-up air unit in transit lease space~ Transit cost only Altemate 11, dodc tower pavilion and weather protec~iar~ arcades--Transit cost only Altemate 15, ceramic fiit (su~screen) on transi# shelter gfazing-Transit cost only !n the case af altemates 10, 11, and 15, these items are re(ated in design and function to the bus ma(I and transi# lease spaces, and their costs ai-e reasonably bom within the District portion of the transit budget 8. Altemates not ~commended for award are: na. 3, Chemeketa St frontage streetscape worlc; no. 6, faed seating in the hearing room; and, na. B, demountable wall partitions in county office spaces. The development team feels that the streetscape work can more effic~ently be added lafer in the pmject, either as a change order or as a separate bid. Streetscape funds will be avaiEable for this addition, under the terms of ou~ agreement with the City. Th~ fixed seating option needs more discussion with the po(icy boards, and can easily be added as a change or separate bid at the apprvpriate time. The dsmountable partition question is solely a County issue. 8. Attachment C presents the Transit District budget for the Courthouse Square projed, as bid. The total prujed cost is n.duced just under $3QO,a00 from the