My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10093
Title
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
615
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
stated that health care reform is very volatile right now. Within the next <br />18 months, we'll know more about where we are, she added. . <br />Jack Munro reminded the committee that the end result is to develop a <br />plan that is built on a foundation of assumptions. We will need to <br />articulate with greater clarity and be much more specific. <br />Randy Curtis stated the population figures in the report were <br />conservative. The consultants concede that a growth rate of 2.28% <br />annually would be realistic. Every department may not have the same <br />growth, he continued. There might, for example, be a 20% growth in <br />demand for service and a 0% population growth. <br />Ken Roudybush reiterated the need for information from other sources <br />and a specific discussion of services in order to avoid duplication. Larry <br />Oglesby again mentioned that space needs may be reduced over the <br />years by improved technology. <br />Valerie Vollmar stated the need for justification for staffing increases. <br />Lydia Buchanan asked if that were not in the consultant notes. Valerie <br />Vollmar responded that a narrative description is needed. <br />Randy Curtis pointed out that the data varies from department of <br />department. His department needs, for example, are based on what <br />other departments do. <br />Jack Munro said that anyone looking at Exhibit 3 would wonder at the <br />different rates of growth and he agreed that justification might be needed. <br />Space needs are an important issue, Ruth Johnson added. The kind of <br />service provided should determine what kind of facility is planned. A <br />discussion on space needs followed, and Ken Sherman mentioned that <br />the subcommittees were asked to design their space needs. Jack <br />Munro pointed out that the public might feel that those needs are <br />suspicious, but those involved with the department on a daily basis <br />wouldn't agree. Mark Caillier said their department went through the <br />= report page by page to agree or disagree with it. In some cases they <br />disagreed vehemently. <br />Valerie Vollmar again suggested specificiry in terms of service provided, <br />staff needs, facility description, a narrative of how operations are <br />expected to change, their impact, and the departmenYs <br />recommendations of how facilities will be used to address the needs of <br />the population. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.