My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10093
Title
Meetings Steering Committee(Folders 1-2)
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
615
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Use of Juries <br />Jury trials are still seen as the anchor of the state court system, providing the fundamental <br />assurance of justice in criminal and civil cases. The state court system is committed to <br />preserving and protecting the right to a jury trial, but it is also dedicated to reducing the <br />public's reliance on jury trials to resolve disputes. While the absolute number of jury trials <br />has not declined substantially due to an increasing population, the percentage of cases <br />resolved by juries has dropped significantly due to the rise of new approaches to dispute <br />resolution. <br />• The state courts have worked to reduce inappropriate uses of jury trials. In addition to <br />introduction of the case assessment process, the state constitution and statutes have <br />been revised to establish much stricter requirements for the use of a jury trial. For <br />example, the minimum amount in controversy in a civil dispute has been raised to <br />~5,000 (in 1994 dollars). For amounts higher than this statutory minimum, access to a <br />jury trial is not determined by the amount in controversy, but by the issues at stake <br />and/or the rights of the parties involved. In addition, the need for jury trials in <br />criminal cases has been reduced through other dispute resolution methods <br />• The state courts have also worked to make those jury trials that are appropriate more <br />affordable. Smaller juries are commonly used (six as opposed to 12 jurors), reducing the <br />time and expense of empaneling a jury. <br />A Changing Legal Profession <br />The role of attorneys has changed substantially in the multi-option justice system. This is <br />mainly due to the decline af the adversarial model and the rise of new approaches to <br />dispute resolution. While attorneys still maintain a highly visible role as litigators, those <br />who successfully settle matters out of court or without a jury trial are highly regarded by <br />their clients and peers. <br />• [n working as problem-solvers, attorneys have developed new ways of defining and <br />resolving discovery and pleac~ing issues without direct court intervention <br />• The h~gh volume of disputes now processed out of court and the growin~ demand for <br />new kinds of legal services has broadened the scope of the legal profession. Attorneys <br />Fi~ial Vision Tcxt 12 A«g~~st 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.