My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Northblock- RFD Drafts
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Northblock- RFD Drafts
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 4:30:46 PM
Creation date
8/16/2011 3:54:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10260
Title
Northblock- RFD Drafts
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Project Coordination
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ <br />~ <br />~~ <br />~ <br />Noise and Vibration: <br />Design and construction techniques should be utilized which mitigate noise impact from buses on the <br />~ transit mall. These may include wall insulation, mechanical air conditioning sound isolation, etc. <br />V. SITE INFORMATION <br />Special conditions on this site make it both challenging and unique, these conditions include: , <br />_ - ~r~; ~~ _r7t~' ~~; ' `* ' '~`l~ ' ~ tul ~7;, - <br />I <br />, a~~ ~,~:, . <br />[Need more information here] ~ r:~ , f ~` <br />~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~u~'k~ ,z„~ <br />, r~i~!r~ ~ ~;~? ^r~-.,}~r,~ ~~ , o {=.~~ <br />VI. EVALUATION CRTTERIA ~ ` <br />The development team will evaluate proposals based on the fo(lowing criteria. The criteria listed below <br />are descriptive and not limiting: the development team may also consider any other factors related to the <br />criteria, even if they are not listed. <br />1 . Cost and affordability. <br />2 . Proposed Business Terms <br />3. Strength of the Proposer's development team. <br />4. Relevant experience and success of the Proposer's development teams in projects of a similar <br />nature. <br />5. Compatibility of the proposed project with the larger site development <br />6. Compatibility and relationship of the pmposed project to transit use and the transit center. <br />VII. SELECTION PROCESS, SCHEDULE & CRTTERIA <br />~ Marion County and the Salem Transit District will conduct a fair and equitable process for selecting a <br />development team for this project. During the first phase, a selection committee will review the <br />proposats, and recommend a short list of qualifying teams; based on how well the~ teams satisfy the <br />selection criteria stated below. The Selection Committee will include ~c~c, ~~^c, ~~c, <br />and xxxx~cx. <br />During the first phase, the committee may also recommend a single team as the pmject finalist, rather <br />than proposing a short list. If this case occurs, the second phase of the selection process would be waived, <br />and Marion County and the Salem Transit District would enter directly into negotiations with that team <br />on a Memorandum of Understanding and a Disposition and Deve(opment Agreement <br />During the second phase, the Selection Committee will interview representatives from the development <br />teams on the short list. The Selection Committee shall tentatively recommend the fmalist team. Marion <br />County and the Salem Transit District, following negotiations between County staff and the development <br />team will make final determination. <br />A. Schedule <br />The selection process is expected to take XX weeks. This time period does not include <br />negotiation of the Memorandum of Understanding or the development agreement. The <br />preliminary schedule for the selection is as follows: <br />Item Target Date <br />1. Issuance of Request for Proposals <br />2. Selection Committee Briefing by County &. Transit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.