Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)

Home Browse Search

extra soil as possible so there would be as little fill and compaction as possible. Kathleen _ ~ proposed that the cleanup for the UST's and Chevron be approached separately as each would require different levels of investigation. Kathleen estimated total UST cleanup time to be three weeks. Dewatering 7-10 If P 2 is no longer being considered, Mike H. does not require the completed GRI drilling report. Dan asked that the data gathered be sent to Marion County in case o~ future needs. Additionally, the data could provide some useful information pertairling to soils conditions on the site; e.g. GRI discovered a subsurface void during their in~vestigation. ACTION: Bill to generate a revised wark arder to include only work condt~cted to date. Stan Kelsey and Mike to review revised drainage and dewatering needs. Ron to research a"no water discharge" cleaning system for P 1. Structural 7-17 The cost of shearwalls appears to be far greater than originally anticipated. The cost to go to a rigid frame adds $2.50 per sf. The decision to utilize strictly shearw~lls needs to be reexamined. ACTION: Curt Pence, Leonard and Mike Hayford to meet'to determine actual costs and impacts of each option. 7-10 Dan suggested that the County and Transit might want to consider making ~ight modifications to the structural plans in order to facilitate future floor penetr~tions for communicating stairs. ACTION: Leonard will attempt to locate areas wh~re this might be desirable. 6-27 ACTION: Mike Hayford will provide MMDC with a list of owners who h~ve recently completed PT office buildings. MMDC to contact these owners to gain the~r insights. Rev. 7-3 Leonazd to contact Mike to reconfirm this as an action item. Rev. 7-10 MMDC would like to pursue the marking the tendons and installing floor ta floor knockouts. Signage 6-27 MMDC inquired as to building standard signage design responsibility. Leonard confirmed that signage design would be done in-house. R.G. indicated that Transit and Marion County are developing a logo and design for the project that will prQbably be incorporated to some degree in non-code building signage. ACTION: MM~C will provide some examples of building standard signage. Building Systems 7-17 Byron proposed that Interface take responsibility for coordinating life safety requirements. 6-27 MMDC inquired whether PGE has been apprised of the electrical needs of t~e project e.g. power requirements and availability of services. Leonard indieated that PG~ has been involved from the beginning and there is no indication of a problem with capacity. Rev. ~ 7-3 Dan inquired whether Civil has confirmed adequacy of services for other utilities,