Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)

Home Browse Search

adequate soft costs included in budget. Randy will include a contingency a.tid soft costs in his funding submittal. ACTION: Craig to prepare soft costs by 8/24. 7-3 Byron and Ron will work with Leonard and Dave to compare the latest DD rplans with Dave's budget. ACTION: Byron, Ron, Leonard and Dave to meet. ONGOING ISSUES Parking 7-10 Leonazd has done a preliminary layout of P1. He has laid out two scenarios with stall counts at 369 (option 1) and 372 (option 2). The City conveyed mixed signrals regarding the concept of expanding under the sidewalk. ACTION: Mike Hayford to I review revised designs to determine impact on structural. Dave to price cost of rev~sed plans. Randy and R.G. to meet with the City to begin work on obtaining revocable sidewalk permit. Rev. 7-17 Randy and R.G. met with the City. A firm decision r~garding the utilization of a revocable sidewalk pernut is expected 7/18. Acoustical / Vibration 6-27 MMDC recommended that we bring on an acoustical consultant to assist in' addressing sound isolation issues. MMDC has contacted Russ Altermatt and Associat~s. Rev. 7-17 Russ Altermatt and Assoc. has provided a proposal and are on hold pending resolution of various design issues. Permitting 7-10 Leonard indicated that review for issuance of the foundation pernut is apprpximately eight weeks. 6-27 Craig expressed a concern with adequate budget coverage of permits and faes. The team discussed some specific permit and fees, e.g. sewer and water hookup, traff~c impact, building permits, etc. Dave indicated that Kevin Newland from his office wbuld be meeting with the city to gather additional permit and fee information. Crai~ would like to have Rick Williams attend. ACTION: Dave and Leonard will do additiomal permit and fee research. Rick and Kevin will set a time to meet with the city. Rev. 7-10 Dave and Leonard will forwa.rd any existing paperwork relating to pernuts or fees to tvIMDC. Environmental 7-3 The group discussed approaches for removing contaminated soils. Remove prior to mass excavation or as a part of. Pence / Kelly has no money in the budget for hauling or treating contaminated soil. Randy was concerned about slowdown in projeCt in order to deal with soil. ACTION: Kathleen will attempt to quantify dollars involv~d with removing contaminated dirt. Dave will attempt to quantify schedule impacts. Rev. 7-10 it was decided that the probable best approach is to clean the site prior to mrass excavation. ACTION: Staton to develop price to remove contaminated sbils by 7-24. Rev. 7-17 Century West needs an assumption regarding depth of hotspox removal. They have assumed that Staton will be digging to sixteen feet. The team discussed the most beneficial depth of excavation. It was detertnined that the goal is to r~move as little ~