My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:47:33 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:03:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10302
Title
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
BLDG Date
8/19/1997
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Courthouse Syuare Interview panel <br />~. June 21, 1996 <br />Present: Gary Dennison, Bob Speckman, Randy Curtis, Bill Frey, Richard Hayden, RG Andersen- <br />Wyckoff, Mary Pearmine, Maynard, 7ohn Whittington, Maynard Hammer, Mike Hansen <br />Absent: Ed Martin, Ann Gavin Sample <br />Agenda: <br />Bob called the meeting to order. <br />Bill Frey stated that he has a conflict of interest, he has a property listed on the property and will <br />not cast a vote in the selection process. <br />lst item of business: David Glennie's letter of resignation. No action is required. <br />2nd item of business: Bob asked that staff take a moment to review the hand out prior to discussion. <br />Bob opened the discussion by stating that staff is comfortable with the reasons for going forward <br />with one of the two developers. He acknowledged that it is difficult to select between the two. <br />~ Randy stated that part of the dilemma that staff is in, is due to changes and new information <br />(COP's), Randy still feels that both of these developers are qualified to make this project happen. <br />In fairness to the process, discussion around the issue of project management, the element of <br />financial services, and the 3rd are the architectural services and the... <br />Ra.ndy stated that he that the changes to the plans and the financial directions (... recorder) <br />Asked for discussion around the differences in services and proposals, with the result being making <br />a decision. <br />The other item that Randy feels is critical is that he feels there should be a decision today. Neither <br />proposal targeted exactly what the project demands, the goal is to pick another partner and begin <br />at square one to begin obtaining the final funding, critical that we proceed with the time schedule <br />we have set up. Need the development team on board from this point forward. Does not see the <br />option to go out for more bidding. Sees that with the two proposals a decision can be made. Randy <br />spoke with both Dan Berrey and SABA and expressed that COP's aze <br />Parking structure, spaces, want to stay under 400 spaces (DEQ) <br />(recorder) <br />~ There is a commitment on the part of the County to retum this property to the public and put it back <br />on the tax role. By bririging in retail and the public we can accomplish that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.