Laserfiche WebLink
Ann - noted the architectural plans, minority position that she will abstain from voting, very <br />~ supportive of the Canadian concept, appalled by the mega parking structure that was part of the <br />Prudential package, if we move ahead, the parking should be clearly and carefully looked at. <br />Randy -- Canadian came up with above ground, staff will move towards pazking underground, both <br />firms agree this is the way to go, limited to 350 spaces on site. <br />RG - would like to clarify that the private section, count wants 110,000 sf, 60 up front, under certain <br />conditions, whether they be t~able or non taxable, (recorder...) does not have to build at this <br />time, can add on later, with the use of COP's, which is part of the discussion, it doesn't have <br />Richard- emphasized the asset of the Franklin, that ability to liquidate it now, which would reduce <br />the bonowing needs. <br />Bob - comment towards the motion? <br />Gary - the motion is based on the recommendation of a partner only <br />Randy - would like to express thoughts toward the motion, agrees with Richard's opinion that a <br />second opinion. But will support Prudential, they uniquely raised the option of the Franklin, very <br />valuable asset. Need to proceed, may not have precl (recorder...) feels driven to move ahead, sees <br />~ a month to a month and a half of work left, sees this as putting it ...cannot support a motion that <br />delays the decision. Will do \\~Bob <br />BOB - minority should have the last work <br />Vote: opposed Ann, Richard; abstention, Bill. <br />Mary asked if we should consider if we should further move to encourage exploration of the second <br />option, if the first developer is not feasible, is there the comfort level to try to resolve with second <br />developer. <br />Gary - this addresses his first concern. Which is why his motion was that we need to be very <br />specific, both feels that both are very willing to be fle~ble and do whatever it takes. Is opposed to <br />going back to SABA, the protocol, having made a decision. <br />BOB - no reason we could not reconvene and use this group again. <br />Bob - any other business <br />Randy - thanked the group, would like to have had more options, respects Richard's and Ann's <br />position, and acknowledged the time constraints. <br />Ann - wished we had been at this point a year ago. <br />~ <br />