My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:47:33 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:03:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10302
Title
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
BLDG Date
8/19/1997
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ <br />~ <br />Courthouse Square Project <br />Interview Panel Planning Session <br />June 4, 1996 <br />Ralph Schwartzman, Saba <br />Jim McGregor, SABA <br />Mark Hudsbeth, US Bank <br />Nancy McClain, US Bank <br />Discussion: <br />Maynard was introduced as an expert on COP fmancing <br />General obligation bonds <br />revenue bonds <br />COPs <br />Each can be t~ exempt or t~able. There is no such thing, evidence of participation in a stream of <br />income. <br />Lots of COPs, general obligations, full faith in credit to back up the debt. Revenue is pledging a <br />certain stream of revenue to back up debt. <br />No general obligation, or revenue pledge, do not have to go to vote, because there is a walk away <br />prevision. They are not binding successive governing bodies to honor that COP. Since it is not <br />binding, does not require vote, does not meet the test of being legally binding. <br />Rating agencies rate them and consider them an obligation. If you walk away you ruin your credit <br />rating. There have been problems where one government enters into these obligations and the next <br />government walks away. Rating agencies notice this. <br />If they are ta~c exempt, they are subject to the same provisions in the governing code, the market will <br />want to know what it is for, how the organization plans to keep the obligation, and how they will <br />pay it. That puts a lot of burden on a brand new building, space. <br />To be tax exempt there are very specific things those things can finance, retail is not one of those <br />things. These things need to be looked at and rated on their merit by a bonds expert. When you <br />start introducing private space you start running into problems. <br />You can have about 10 percent private space in a tax exempt office. There are certain types of tax <br />exempt bonds, but most do not apply to retail space. <br />In its structure it is a lease purchase agreement, typically sold by a government entity and as a public <br />~ offering. If you private or broker lease purchase agreement, that is not a public offering. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.