My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Demolition Report
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Demolition Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 4:43:32 PM
Creation date
9/8/2011 9:20:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10334
Title
Demolition Report
Company
Century West
BLDG Date
6/5/1998
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Project Coordination
Project ID
CS9701 Site Survey and Remediation
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
568
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
e~~~a~'yi 11:~~ a 503 245 8894 CHRSC CONSULTpNT <br />P.03 <br />~. SPE IFIC MEANS TO ACHIEVE CQMPLIANCE INCLUDING ENGINEERIN <br />C NTR L <br />Since fugitive dust is expected to be the greatest lead hazard major emphasis <br />wil! be placed on dust suppression. This wil! be by the use of water spray. The main <br />assignment af one employee will ba to cpnstantly assess the degree pf dust <br />suppression and to apply ~ water spray to any area showing dust emission. <br />Remova~ of accumulated debris promptly and regularly is another methpd wt-ijch <br />will be used to minimize employee exposure. <br />Minimization of possible dust exposure to employees working outside the site <br />proper will be by vacuuming or dry cleaning of w~rkers clothing and washing of <br />footgear uppn leaving the actual damolitiorl site. <br />6. TE HNOL4GY QNSIDERED IN MEETING THE PEL <br />Other teCl~na(ogy, such as negative pressure enclasures, mechanical ventilation <br />and the use of amended water for debris wetdown was considered. Because of the <br />expected low hazard frpm airbarne lead these measures were deferred until air <br />sampling showed the need for them. Beside increasing the cost of the project these <br />measures would also increase the time required for the job ~nd the time of emp~oyee <br />exposure to lead. <br />~ PERSQNAL MUNITOR~NG DATA US~D IN THE EMPLQYE~ EXf~OSURE <br />ASSESSMENT <br />The air monftoring results obtained during the employee exposure asssssment <br />will be attached to and become p~rt of this compliance plan. <br />8. ~ETAILED SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM <br />Sinca this is a refatively simple job, no subcantracts, rental agreements or <br />pu~ch~se orders as listed in 1926.62(e)(2)(ii)(E) exist at this time. Should they become <br />necessary they would be included and m~de a part of this compli~nce pian. <br />Before work begins, a meeting will be held to inform all employees of the <br />hazardS associated witi~ this project and the controls #o be impiemented to minimize <br />employee exposure. In general the ct~ranology for compliance beginning with the first <br />day of work is as follows. <br />a. Employee orientation and safety awareness training <br />b. Acknowledgment, by signature, of the undsrstanding of the SSP <br />c. Setup of engineered exposure reduction <br />d. Setup of respiratory protectian program <br />e. Setup of air monitoring <br />f. Begin demolition process <br />g. Analyze air monitoring data <br />~. Make protection adjustments <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.